That Russia can offer to the world or Oligarchs go to war.

The last rollers with E.Fedorov (ссылка, ссылка) shone his unambigiuous and unequivocal position in relation to privatizing and nationalization, placed the last points above i. It is: Evgeny Федоров is a successive liberal, seeing efficiency and progressiveness of peculiar, opponent of idea of public or folk domain.

 Thus the idea of "nationalization" is understood by E.Fedorov exceptionally in form translation of property from foreign in Russian jurisdiction, creations of class of national bourgeois and oligarchs, i.e. within the framework of finding of national sovereignty, but nowise not social transformations.

 Because the similar point of view fully (and even probably!) can appear official position of Russian power, liberation movement and personally В.В.Putin, she deserves the most intent attention.

 How really is Russia able similarly to overcook liberalism, how once marxism? One of most cruel and hard-edged, narrow-classed, godless and immoral theories - in the attractive social state of domestic type? («О параллелях»).

 However, than anymore I reflect above this question, the I more understand that it is fundamentally impossible without the complete and unreserved denial of liberalism. It appears from that from a liberal dogma resolutely there is nothing to take useful or positive: she is primitive too. As is generally known, to create a theory, geometry or algebra required two and more than postulates. Liberalism is based on one only, obviously incorrect postulate: a market is ideal. And that is it here possible to take on an armament?

  Although if I wrong and does not see something hidden and important, I ask to remedy me.

Lacks of liberalism, incompatible with life and incorrigible within the framework of initial postulate, - dam up a pond.

 Foremost, we will mark his obvious poverty, infantilism and social injustice. When a man is simply farmed from the duties of husband, father, son, defender of homeland and simply decent man. Under pretence of that earning money, he already performed the most main public duty the same, and now free to do everything, that to him pleasingly.

  From here follows both marriages by contract and domestic capitalism: implementation of home-work children for money, domestic usury, when children take loans for own parents or take care after the aged parents only for the sake of material benefit.

  In other words, liberalism not simply has nothing positive, but he is fundamentally incompatible with the christian values of love and help to the fellow creature. Taking of him for base conception of society not simply unfairly, but destructively to bases of this society - family. That is why Russia it is not given to overcook this generation of the West, but only to tear away. If a communism is in a great deal near to christianity, then liberalism in the basis denies him. Therefore no compromise here can not be: either God or money.

  It is known that among many readers arguments of justice, moral principles or divine commandments not especially quoted. There is fully scientific explanation.

 Only political economy conception that can be adopted by a theory or science is marxism. And this theory denies the construction of society of future on principles liberalism completely. Thus it is straight confirmed by practice: progress of productive forces trends testify to the all greater height of the involved people and resources. For example, for prosperous motor industry the milliardth markets of sale are required, the same for space, electronic-domestic or military industries.

But what will be, if all these corporations of global value will become private? It means that role of the state, power, including president of Russian Federation only, will appear in the suspended state, more precisely their direct function, indulging of interests of these corporations will become. In fact budget, influence and even cleanly military force of modern corporations fully comparable with the large state.

About this problem exhaustively I.V. Stalin spoke out once: because productive relations more accept collective character, a peculiar on capital goods is rudimentary. Thus the class of bourgeoisie, aspiring at any cost to save the privileged position and control, becomes by force reactionary and regressive.

All of it is literally confirmed by modern realities: by the artificially caused unemployment, suppression of height of the labour productivity, appearance of enormous sphere of dependants and public vermin, by the considerable decline of quality and tenure of employment of the manufactured goods dangerous for a health and ecology of experiments in agriculture and medicine.

  How is it possible on a background what be going on to continue to repeat over and over again about superiority of private enterprise initiative? Today it is simple unscientific.

 Moreover, here I will say of a hypothesis similarly that a shallow enterprise environment will gradually die off even. It appears from that such are modern tendencies in absolutely all industries. McDonalds ousts shallow snack bars: multicriticized, but the assured quality and forecast price oust doubtful folk work like a cheburek or booths with shawarma, in that and the first and second is a lottery.

  In agriculture small-scale enterprises appear quite uncompetitive as compared to large producers (even without taking advantage of their total co-operation of times of Stalin MTS).

 Thus the same situation even in the field of service. For example, can be paid attention, that in barbershops on our entire countries remained only three types of hair-dos for men: recruit, first year of service and second tenure of employment? Is there a question, and that really so difficult from the point of view of modern science and technique to create the vehicle of automatic hair-cutting with the hardly greater amount of original variants? As I understand, here problem not in a technique, but exceptionally in the lack of fantasy for marketing specialists.

  It was desirable to show on this example, that even such traditionally private and creative profession, as a hairdresser soon can appear on verge of disappearance. A like can similarly expect a waiter: the stands of automatic order appear in many cafes. And if to generalize, then it turns out that niches for shallow businessmen in course of time it will remain all less than, i.e. not only a large, but shallow peculiar is doomed to disappearance because of technical progress.

So what can be private enterprise initiative, in principle, if it on the essence in modern society identical to the bows and arrows of some rudimentary savages against tanks and airplanes of valuable civilization?

  Scientific and technical progress and peculiar are incompatible. Here, that talks science.

But, except science and morality there is yet and political expediency. We will consider similarly this point of view. Maybe, on this stage of political fight is it expedient to use oligarchs? Will oligarchs go on war?

Think, that such statement of a question does an answer maximum obvious. From the oligarchs of benefit to Motherland no more, than from the French recruits or mister Pytkin in the rear of enemy. Useless they are recruits, to militate they will become only under pretence of mortal threat, and it is an unbelievable situation practically. In fact them all arranges: wife and children - in London, mistresses and business - in Russia, money - in the secluded places.

And here Putin and Fedorov call them on war. And simpler than students from Moscow Universyty or Plehanov Institute to send to dig trenches, what though in something to count on oligarchs on business of national liberation motion.

  In spite of all improbability of thesis "oligarchs go to war", there are quite a bit historical parallels that. An example is most appropriate and fresh, when L.D.Kuchma planned to build the strong Ukrainian economy, leaning against the class of large owners. That went out it is known: "Kuchma - out"!. Owners preferred to restive and very economic Kuchma of where more tolerant and amenable Yushchenko.

 Even presence of general mortal enemy, as in case of Hitler or Napoleon quite not means for this class awakening of patriotism or solidarity with the people. I will remind, West-European bourgeoisie at one time with a delight accepted and first and second. And now even is there no genius-aggressor naturalized in a flesh with cannons and dare-devils, who will Putin appeal against to the oligarchs?

 Therefore NEVER the class of large owners will begin to support В.В.Putin and national liberation motion. And to count on them - there is the most rough and irreparable error.

 Although the class of small and middle holders can and must become one of supports of national liberation motion. But great folk masses must become key support, and by main slogans is nationalization and large public domain giving a benefit to the country, and to the masses - work and salary. And mediated the same giving a source to existence to the shallow shopkeepers, merchants and рестораторам.

 So, there is the last question without an answer. What must Russia offer to the world?

From aforesaid obviously, that on the modern stage traditional chart, when Russia processed a western idea in something the whole and acceptable (as it was in case with the "enlightened monarchy" or marxism) will not pass.

  Time clean to reject the cultural and scientific dominant of the West and say finally the word in sociological and economic science came.

 And reverse motivation of elite and deflation nonmonetary economic model must become such word.

 The first means that than more pride of place is occupied by a man in a social stair, the less meaningful there must be wage incentives for him in the most literal sense of this word.

 The second means that the inevitable height of the labour productivity levels all economic and monetary indicators and stimuli (for example, GDP) fully, destroys the concepts of peculiar, money and takes a management an economy to elementary logistic of human labour and rest.

  And because the logistic of human labour and rest, obviously, can not be sense of human life, then a fundamentally new value is opened at science and work.

As that so.