In collection
of phrases this theme is repeatedly rose, and it would seem not always to
the place. Now possibility appeared not only to generalize and also evidently
to confirm said.
The question is about the special, almost magic
responsibility of woman for forming of family, for harmony and heat of mutual
relations in it, for the safe decision of generation gap, for that does a man a
man.
On a
superficial look the said can show oneself banal masculine chauvinism, attempt
to shift all responsibility on a woman, to make out of her extreme, guilty. But
we will hope that a reader will not be limited to the superficial look.
It is
indicated a christian commandment, that a wife must obey the husband. But it is
said other commandment and that let large attend to less.
Understanding
by people that a man weaker always yields to the woman, exists, but it is
somewhere at the level of funny things. "If a tiger attacked woman, let
removed".
Similar
irony ensues from deep misunderstanding to essence of relations between men and
women. Men are extremely ashamed to confess the complete insignificance and
inability in the question of management by a woman, if she will not wish it and only until she allows it.
The east customs of violence and slavery ensue
exactly from this complex of inferiority, when a woman at any moment can be
proposed from home begone without every living. But somehow unnoticed, that
this cruel tradition though as elevated an east man or gave to him the
effective instrument of influence on a woman.
Western
tradition is analogical, when a woman is simply bought, tempt different
beautiful things or simply pump full drugs. A slut for some reason always
appears nobler and more influential than the client.
And, as
an extreme degree of masculine chauvinism, aspirations by all means to manage
with magic of woman charm, it is needed to mention very strange for us, almost
hysterical fear of pederasts before women, when woman vagina equates with the
gates of hell, mortally dangerous test for any man.
Only
country, where a woman is deified, belong with homage to all her nice
weaknesses and oddities - it is we. And, it is necessary to say, it is an only
method to manage with invincible woman magic: to surrender at discretion.
Strictly speaking, just like this and the most happy marriages consist.
But why
in marriage exactly must a woman obey man? And because exactly a woman from
nature is extremely hard and despotic. A man usually prefers to consult by the
friend, a woman always prefers to put before a fact.
A man
can be carried away and lose a head from vodka, drugs, casino or rock beautiful
woman, but sobering up, always goes back to a native hearth.
If a
woman leaves from house, she carries away with itself and hearth. And a new
woman, coming in a house, fully will transform him in the completely other
world, at a the same man and children. While changing of man in a house not
especially changes his mode.
On a
woman the career of man depends wholly, it is impossible to be successful in
intermingling with other people, and the more to manage them, if it does not
pass in regard to an own wife. ("Go, teach the wife to cook cabbage soup”.)
Moreover,
nothing kills a man so easily, quickly and reliably, as a contempt of woman.
Like it
is possible easily to see on historical examples. Dependence of Napoleon from a
favour Josephine is known. In general, all first ladies practically without
exceptions, played a very important role political life of any country, from
the ancient Persia jewish woman Esther, to the wives of presidents of Clinton,
Gorbachev, Yushchenko and Medvedev.
But
this rule does not work in reverse direction. At a reigning wife her husband
always remains a contemptible consort, size insignificant and pitiful. Is this
not best confirmation of natural woman despoticness and authoritarianness, that
does destroy any family built on the rough and primitive prevailing of woman
inevitably?
Here
can be objection. But are they among women uncomplaining and weak-willed
creatures, submissively standing the mockeries of husband, taking beatings
above itself and children?
This
objection is far-fetched. A weak-willed and uncomplaining creature is incapable
to love, and consequently has nothing in common with christianity. The
submission of weak-willed creature is caused by fear, avidity, laziness, but in
any way by not humility. And christianity not simply recommends in this case,
but hardly and uncompromisingly requires: "leave everything and follow
with me". Although to the uncomplaining creature much more comfortably to
stand mockeries, than to put an end to them. And in this submission this
creature denies christianity not simply, but femininity too.
After
this small review of supervisions and conformities to law we will pass to
practical confirmation of said.
But as
it can be, in fact even today the solid stake of population of countries the
USA and Europe remembers the that blessed time perfectly, when the breach of
faith was considered unusual an event, and divorce, disintegration of family
were considered the personal catastrophe. In fact yet now at good enough few of
habitants of these "front-rank" countries the best moments of life
are associated with the heat of mother hands, such desirable gifts-surprises in
her bag and smell something unusually delicious.
How did
they reach to life such?
Now we
will consider the products of industry of Hollywood. It touches literature and
publicism similarly, and similarly music and theatre. But the obviously
happening on an example cinema is most protuberant.
What
character of woman does offer to us American cinema industry?
Foremost, it is character of rock beautiful
woman, like Mareline Monro or Sharon Stone, from that without a mind all
surrounding men. It can be Soldier Jane, but much better, if soldier is
combined with a rock beautiful woman like Lara Croft.
Some not too clever man said: "beauty will
save the world". Presumably, he just prophetically foresaw the giant
incomes of business of plastic surgery, and similarly huge demand on beauty
from the side of advertisement, cine and other business, in fact beauty in the
modern understanding is an excellent liquid asset. In any event is this
dominant idea about character of woman.
Nightspot
singer, slut, haughty or eccentric wife - here other model characters of woman.
Thus very often a bookless slut appears much more moral and humane, what wife
of hero of film from swell society. (For example, to "Change placed",
“Pretty woman")
There is
a great number and positive characters of women: it is nice good-natured thick
black women from a maid, secretary, faithful battle friends of main heroes-men.
However,
even on the roles of the second plan, even in the most episodic instants or
mass meeting you will not meet the proper character of woman-mother.
All
American cine mothers are necessarily irritable, dissatisfied, concerned,
drunk, loud, offended and inadequate. They stick, militate, fight, ache, yell
and drink. But the stages of simple domestic idyll are under the most frightful
censorship, that never was, is not and will be not in regard to the stages of
sexual violence, murders and horror.
For
example, in "Terminator" Sara Connor swings, shoots, the course of
young fighter passes, writhes in a hysterics and, by the way, all of it very
small helps when business comes to the real fight. Between that only, what it
would be really necessary her to do, so not to exhaust it itself by ridiculous
physical exercises, and to be for the son the real careful and loving mother, to
bring up the deserving human beginning in him, give to him wonderful
remembrances about the that world for that he will have soon to enter into a
fight.
The
fairy-tale of A.S. Pushkin is so remembered: about a weaver and cook, who is
impercipient, that main task of woman - to bear an athlete, deserving son, and
quite not to win in a show on the best shooter, cook or ranger.
So,
character of mother is under the most strict prohibition in the civilized
western culture. And it is a frightful and ominous fact.
But is
it just in relation to men?
No.
Although the masculine heroes of the American cinema too rarely differ in
perfection. They are capricious, suspicious, inattentive, awkward. But basic
their most widespread defect there is just excessive employment, fascination by
work. Do you agree, a very cute defect?
Moreover,
there are fully positive and cute characters of exemplary fathers-heroes, like
Chuck Norris or Bruce Willis, that manage fully harmoniously to combine family
and work. It, certainly, rareness, thus, usually characteristic for revenge-movies,
when a protagonist either takes revenge on or liberates hostages for
terrorists. But fact present: positive character of the real domestic man, thus
not driveling and aching, and fully mature and adequate – IS ADMITS.
How can
it be?
This
conclusion it is possible to unseal and hang up in a scope in every family:
The
creators of new world order above everything are afraid of simple word "mama".
Are afraid so panicky, that blotted out him from all modern works of art. Are
afraid of more Jesus Christ, that they were able successfully to garble and
modify.
Because
a word "mama" and lie are incompatible. A mother always sees a lie
through. Forgetting about a mother, a man stops to be a man.
Exactly
from here "ancient" curses go on a mother. From here an insult goes
"mother sonny", when a child is trained, that to love and obey mother
- it is ashamed. From here the custom of separation of child goes from a
mother, as though she "does" for his martial spirit. Corrupts certainly,
inoculating immunity against authority of covey of raging dregs.
A role
is notable in this question of the soviet cinema. Unlike modern Russian cinema belching
up a continuous base-alloy abomination.
In
practically any soviet cinema character of mother, Motherland-mother stood by
oneself. In "Officers" a basic with a plot role curls round an
officer mother and wife. In "Wedding in a redbreast" mother and wife,
waiting soldier home is a mainline in a plot. In the kind half of revolutionary
and soldiery songs the question is not about a battle friend, namely about a
wife-mother that waits a defender home, rocks a cradle and far goes out to meet
with a little son long-awaited.
And
here a soviet art costs much higher, than all pillars of notorious Russian
literature with their problems of "superfluous people" and "rays
of light in a dark reign".
In fact
even christian love yields the road of maternal love, and Christian Church will
bend to seniority of institute of maternity.
A man that does not love the mother will never love
Jesus Christ.
Moreover,
a mossy and experience recidivist winding off on camps and stages all
disgraceful and useless life, but able to begin to cry at a word
"mother", costs incomparably higher on the degree of the moral
development, what any successful and highly educated multisexual it.
Simply
surprisingly: just the most unhappy and wretched people, like our incorrigible
criminals, saint honour the cult of worship and gratitude to the mother that
will never betray and will not condemn, that can trust whatever, that will
accept you to any.
But
this ancient saving folk wisdom a long ago is changed by the West on the
forfeits of prosperity and doubtful comfort. How long can America stretch on
the imported children, if the institute of mother is almost liquidated?
In fact
one-only task of woman - to become a careful and loving mother, what in the
future even only one man in the world, among all madnesses and adversities,
remembered about that is a main and only human norm of behavior.
