That, if is Putin a traitor?

   Such statement of a question came to a head taking into account two key prognoses on 2013 (refer). It is retirement of government of Medvedev, completion of the too long  period of "new economic policy" and starting of active state building, first of all in an industrial and scientific and technical sphere. The second key prognosis is final determination of Ukraine in the "multivector" and decisive side-step economic association with Russia.

   Thus exactly in such order, absence of advance in purging of the White house of government from liberals automatically means also absence of advance in relationships with Ukraine. That, strictly speaking, and taking place.

   All of it together means an impermissible delay on business of reunion of the Great Country, omission of unique window of possibility, when weakening and employment of our geopolitical opponents in other regions of the world (Middle and Far East) allows to win back a gold card that can become decision in all game.

  Similarly it should be noted that 3-5 years later a generation growing after disintegration of the USSR will come to power, who has acquaintance with it exceptionally after nationalistic propaganda, fairy-tales about poverty, corruption and total deficit.

   In the total Ukraine will be finally lost for the Orthodox Christians world, as once Bulgaria, Serbia, Greece of and other, that once did not "blend" in imperial politics of Nikolay I, anymore caring of channels and advantageous soldiery unions, than about the fate of brotherly people with hope asking Russian citizenship. It is presently possible to establish practically a complete failure in part of realization of optimistic prognoses on 2013.

     Consequently, there is a necessity to consider a variant, that Putin is a traitor, freely or involuntarily playing the side of anglo-saxon and the same successfully blackout any probability of origin authentic, but not false public leader.

   That does follow, if to come from this assumption? Firstly, it means new color of Russia on the map of the world (refer), it becomes from the hearth of resistance to a secret accomplice of the enemy. And because to suppose that China or Iran are the independent and threatening opponents of the USA odd enough, then a situation turns out, that the USA continue to remain world predominant power, and all their current weakening, widely advertised crash of dollar and economic collapse - no more, than prop and playing the public.

    From here the important follows secondly. In the conditions of absence of authentic, but not props, geopolitical rivals all current affairs of the West are taken to the banal stripping of territory, but not real difficult chess party with a deserving opponent. And a filling the soreness of the mouth financial crash is a role of banal alibi, excuse of complete non-participation of the USA to the threatening clouds that gathers on Middle and Far East.

   Accordingly, there is Putin a traitor or no, it will become maximum clear from character of coming world war. If Russia is the hidden accomplice of the West, then by the most simple and effective method of elimination of institutes of the state, industrial infrastructure and radical reduction of population there is small nuclear war. Besides ecologically enough by a clean method, what experience of Hiroshima and Nagasaki testifies to. From here flows out straight, who is advantageous and why creation is needed by Iran of nuclear weapon of the local setting.

   And only in case that the main opponent of the West is the powerful, perfectly armed state, becomes highly sought tactician of "wasp's swarm", great great number of "pirates of the desert", sharpening stability and unity of that yet too big country, that remained. How much benefit from jets and nuclear rockets in a fight against the bands of terrorists, densely meeting with a local population, or even in a fight against the small states, type of Afghanistan, does that support hits?

In this case only means are inflexible and ideological convinced commissars with revolvers, and  now at Russia they are a big shortage.

  Nevertheless more arguments are in behalf on the second scenario. Exactly Russia stands on the way of realization of all soldiery plans the USA, inflicting fully perceptible harm to them. But the point of no return is not passed and all can fully change. To what the schizophrenia plans of defence of Europe testify from the Iranian rockets.

   We will mark, what only in case of treachery of Russia becomes reasonable politics of Ukraine on an association with ЕС. The same, let by the cost of destruction of economy, juvenile justice, dictatorship of homosexuals and study of ridiculous artificial language (very distant from "Рiдної мови" Т.Г. Shevchenko), Ukraine appears back from territory of the global stripping. And it nevertheless some rather better, what it was in the Hitler concentration camp.

   Thus, situation very unsteady. Not eliminated, that to the last the West continues to wait a choice from V.V.Putin and abandons actual both variants.

  But time goes, a pause delays and the choice of the future is formed already regardless of nobody will. Whether there will be character of new world war to have the appearance of the continuous stripping of territory, or bites of "wasp's swarm" of numberless bands of terrorists, will decide after the date of signing (or unsigning) of agreement of association of Ukraine with ЕС. Anyhow in a current year.

   Certainly, it does not mean treachery of V.V.Putin automatically. In fact can take place both ordinary human error and loss of control above a situation. Moreover, begone how many experts testify to the necessity of forming of own clubbish set, about harmfulness of surplus guardianship in regard to Ukraine (especially "inadequate" "свидомытов", "crests", "западенцев" etc.), coming to the direct malevolence (we will "look, as will begin to sing, when we will disconnect gas"!), assertions that Russia perfectly will be able to treat and without Ukraine.

   Exactly on it is counted "North" and "South" streams, they eliminate for Ukraine the last possibility for a manoeuvre. But it is done how enough by Russia for bringing in of Ukraine not only the method of "whip" but also "cake", judging is difficult. L.D.Kuchma supposes that no. (refer, refer, refer) I suppose that without cleaning of Russia from a liberal elite all her suggestions about Eurasian integration are insincere.

   All slowly rolls to the first variant of the primitive stripping of territory of leading countries of Asia. But already the nearest future will give a clear answer for all these questions.

Р.S. On motion discovered that did not give an answer for the main question of the article: whether traitor Putin. And what difference? This his personal choice and responsibility before God. It is important for us, that the consequences of his steps (or their absence) every day more become equivalent to treachery.